- From: rpaul <rpaul@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 04:40:08 -0400
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, <webmaster@richinstyle.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
How do I unsubscribe from this list? I no longer have my intro letter. Please respond ASAP. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> To: <webmaster@richinstyle.com>; <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 1:54 PM Subject: Re: Cursors > From: Matthew Brealey <webmaster@richinstyle.com> > Date: Mon, Apr 3, 2000, 12:49 PM > > > Cursor: link should be introduced as the same as cursor: pointer (much > > in the same way as lower-alpha was ambiguous and therefore lower-latin > > was introducted). > > How is the current value of "pointer" ambiguous? What are the possible > interpretations? What is the difference between "pointer" and "link"? > > > Also there should 'DisabledLink' and 'Disabled' values. > > What would these cursors look like and/or mean? > > Are there current user interface examples which utilize such cursors, or > examples of applications that would take advantage of such cursors? > > > (BTW: Is there no intention to be able to describe 'Tooltips' in CSS, or > > will it appear in some other module than the UI one?) > > It would certainly be useful (and desirable) to describe tooltips in CSS, but > we don't currently have all the pieces necessary to do this in a proposal. > > At a minimum what is needed is something like a :tooltip pseudo-element, e.g. > for an approximation of typical UA behavior: > > [title]:tooltip > { > content:attr(title); > position:relative; display:block; > border: InfoBorder; > background: Info; > color: InfoText; > font: info; > } > > The border, background, color and font values are from the CSS3 UI draft. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-userint > > Tantek > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > The Web has you. Follow the standards. http://www.microsoft.com/mac/ie/ >
Received on Friday, 7 April 2000 04:45:57 UTC