- From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@heeten.nl>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 00:21:15 +0200
- To: "www-style" <www-style@w3.org>
> That would be good, but no rule that could change the size of the > column could be used, for example: border-* margin-* padding-* height, > width, font-size (because lengths can be dependent on em), etc.... > > The reason for this is obvious if you try to imagine the result of: > > P { display: columns; } > P:column(1) { width: 50%; } > P:column(2) { width: 40%; } > P:column(3) { width: 20%; } > P:column(last) { width: 60%; } > > The first column would be 50% wide, the second 40%, and the third > would not fit. So it would try to have two columns. That means that > the last column would be column 2, which would thus be made 60% wide. > But of course that would mean it could not fit. So the last column > would be column 1, which would be made 60% wide, but then column 2 > would fit, so it would be the last column. So it would be made 60% > wide, and.... ARG! > > So the :column(last) pseudo-element would be limited to colour and > background type stuff. Is it worse it? If 2 columns, after applying the :column(last) style, do not fit, then only 1 column should be used. There's no reason to try 2 columns again. Sjoerd Visscher
Received on Friday, 15 October 1999 18:24:24 UTC