- From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:43:10 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Each msg I send to www-style generates the following mailer-daemon answer from one guy who never unsubscribed apparently... Could please someone at W3C remove the corresponding email address from the distribution list ? Thanks a lot... </Daniel> ----- Forwarded message from AMS/AMGSP2/POSTMASTER ----- >From IMCEAMS-AMS_AMGSP2_POSTMASTER@amsworld.com Tue Oct 5 04:32:31 1999 Message-Id: <199910050231.EAA12920@clsmtp.edf.fr> From: AMS/AMGSP2/POSTMASTER <IMCEAMS-AMS_AMGSP2_POSTMASTER@amsworld.com> To: Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr Subject: Mail failure Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 21:31:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 1358 [002] Mail was received for unknown addresses. Message was not delivered to AMS/AMGSP2/kieninka (AMS/AMGSP2/kieninka) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Microsoft Mail v3.0 (MAPI 1.0 Transport) IPM.Microsoft Mail.Note From: Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: CSS-Tranformation mechanism and modularizing CSS Date: 1999-10-04 21:25 Priority: 3 Message ID: 77FD620A9E7AD3119C0E0090279A9345 > > I _know_ that STTS can do all this, but STTS is not going to be > > implemented in the big browsers. CSS3 on the other hand IS, so it's > > just waiting until the functionality of STTS is incorporated in > > CSS3. > > So why not just push for STTS to a CSS3 module? From my STTS author's perspective, for at least one reason : STTS is not cascading. All rules and all declarations are applied, first read first applied. A cascading transformation language using the CSS general syntax would generate a completely different solution, and IMHO dramatically complexify the whole thing. STTS does not need at all to be a CSS3 module. It will refer to some CSS3 parts/modules (selectors, syntax, error handling) and will adopt any profiling system CSS could propose in the future. I think it is enough to make a coherent system, companion of CSS, w/o co-evolution problems. </Daniel> ----- End of forwarded message from AMS/AMGSP2/POSTMASTER -----
Received on Monday, 4 October 1999 22:43:43 UTC