- From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 14:08:45 +0100 (BST)
- To: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edf.fr>
- cc: jelks@jelks.nu, www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > Can you please all answer to the 3 following questions (mark answer with X)? > > YES NO QUESTION > > [X] [ ] Should CSS and Behavioral Extensions be mergeable in a > single file, from a web author's perspective ? Yes, in exactly the same way as SVG's CSS-like extensions should be usable in the same stylesheet. > [X] [ ] Should the text/css mimetype be used for CSS and BECSS ? Yes, just as SVG's CSS extensions will have the mime type text/css and all XML documents (will) have the text/xml mime type. The mime type here is actually giving the 'format' of the document, not the likely scope of the contents. > [ ] [X] Should we propose instead a new mimetype No, see above. > [ ] [X] and a new rel/rev value ? Definitely not; using inline links to style and script sheets is a bad thing anyway. The way forward is with external links/reusable packages. This allows us to more cleanly separate content (the data) and interface (the style and scripts). -- Ian Hickson "I take a Professor Bullett approach to my answers. There's a high probability that they may be right." -- Dr Snow; Mechanics Lecturer at Bath University; 1999-03-04
Received on Monday, 4 October 1999 09:08:50 UTC