- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:26:14 -0800
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 12:21:57 UTC
Todd Fahrner wrote: >The bottom of the following document suggests various values for the >leading, depending not only on the em, but also on the width of the >column of text: > > http://css.nu/articles/typograph1-en.html Yes - good stuff. I would add that fonts with large ex-heights relative to em (aspects) tend to require more leading than otherwise, since relatively generous ascent/descent is optically akin to leading. -------------------------- It strikes me that the definition of font-size: normal is wrong. When I read the footnote on the suggested page, I thought 'Yeah, but what about the font's x-height'. But then I realised that <normal> doesn't vary according to the x-height either, and that this might be wrong.
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 12:21:57 UTC