- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 05:03:58 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Greatly improved background syntax: BODY { position: fixed; top: 10%; left: 10%; } HTML:1 { background-image: url(adbar.jpg); background-height: 10%; /* Either: Relates to the height of the viewport with background-attachment: fixed, and to the width of the viewport with background-attachment: scroll OR relates to the height of the viewport */ background-width: 100%; /* Relates to the width of the viewport */ background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: fixed; } HTML:2 { background-image: url(adbar2.jpg); background-width: 10%; background-repeat: repeat-y; background-attachment: fixed; } The higher the :number, the higher the default z-index for that background. The following should be included in the spec: 1. HTML cannot be positioned, and all backgrounds specified on it are placed relative to the canvas. 2. BODY can be positioned, and if it is, all backgrounds specified on it are placed only onto the positioned area applying to margin and padding alike. 3. If BODY is not positioned, all background properties specified on it are applied to the canvas. This also allows margin-color. P.S. I think the notion of reverse inheritance is the best one to resolve the difficulties with the background of the canvas, it's just that it is irreconcilable with CSS 1 and 2. ===== ---------------------------------------------------------- From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS)) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 1999 08:03:59 UTC