- From: Jan Roland Eriksson <rex@css.nu>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:30:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, 01 Nov 1999 15:04:46 -0800, you wrote: >There is the general issue of placeholder content of which the ALT attribute >on the IMG tag is one example. The ALT attribute for IMG has _one_ single purpose only, to be available as "alternative content" presented _inline_ instead of the graphic that for one reason or another is not shown. e.g. It was _never_ intended to "pop up" as a "tool tip" What the value of ALT should do is to, just straight inline with its surrounding content, present itself as a part of the rest of the content. Lynx handles this aspect of ALT just perfect, let's now see that other ua's can do the same. For all other "presentational issues" ua programmers are allowed to do what they see fit with the content of an eventual TITLE attribute, even on elements that have ALT attributes specified. But don't try to change the meaning of ALT... it's well defined already (has been for years) and should _not_ be tampered with. Also, the idea of a browser that "when I turn graphics off" still insists on showing "placeholders" for those graphical pieces is just absurd. The reason to set graphic loading off is to save download time in the first place, i.e. make the browser _not_ send out HTTP requests for IMG's, but present _inline_ the ALT attribute values for those IMG's instead. <URL:http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~flavell/alt/alt-text.html> -- Jan Roland Eriksson <rex@css.nu> .. <URL:http://css.nu/>
Received on Monday, 8 November 1999 04:59:17 UTC