- From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 07:06:40 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: Daniel.Glazman@der.edf.fr
--- Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr> wrote: > > It is not nice to get 403 errors (forbidden) when > > accessing the CSS spec (nor for that matter when > > accessing the test suite, though there the problem > > seems to be the omission of /current from the > url). > > > > Completely useless information without the URL that > causes that 403. It was a temporary problem, but the complaint was on a matter of principle - I have experience this before, and it gives a general air of incompetence to the W3C site. BTW the urls were the whole CSS spec. ===== ---------------------------------------------------------- From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS)) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place. Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 2 December 1999 10:07:17 UTC