- From: Steve Mulder <smulder@tsdesign.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:23:18 -0400
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>, www-style@w3.org
David, nice piece [1] on font size. You're absolutely right about what the spec says. After thinking about it, I'm not sure I agree that's how it should work. It forces authors to apply CSS to "style-based" HTML tags (like FONT SIZE) instead of to "structure-based" tags (like P), if they want the CSS font-size to override the HTML <FONT SIZE>. As an author, I'd want the browser to use the HTML *only* if no other CSS rule was relevant. The HTML is my "backup formatting" for older browsers, and nothing more. Thus, *this* author would rather it worked differently than it does. (But given current browser support, I know there's really no point arguing for it now...) steve At 4:20 PM -0400 8/17/99, L. David Baron wrote: >On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:04:29 -0400, Steve Mulder (smulder@tsdesign.com) >wrote: >> Yup, that would be a lovely little browser bug. >> >> According to the spec, HTML stylings (like FONT SIZE) should be treated >> with less specificity than all CSS rules. Thus, the CSS *should* override >> the HTML. > >Not when the HTML is: > ><p><font>...</font></p> > >and the relevant CSS rule matches the p element. > >The rule to which you refer (CSS2 section 6.4.4, also in CSS1) only has >an effect when the presentational hint and the CSS rule are on the same >element. Otherwise whichever is deeper in the document tree prevents >inheritance from the one that is higher. See [1], where I explained >this fully. > >However, I *think* <font size="+2"> is often treated as relative to the >base font size of the document, not the font size of the parent >element. That might explain the problem. > >David > >[1] http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=443308087 , also at > http://css.nu/faq/david-on-font.html > >L. David Baron Rising Sophomore, Harvard dbaron@fas.harvard.edu >Links, SatPix, CSS, etc. < http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/ > >Summer Intern, Netscape - however, opinions are entirely my own, etc.
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 1999 17:20:10 UTC