- From: Garth Wallace <gwalla@sfgate.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:57:23 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edf.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Exactly. The way it appears in the spec, "none" would have the effect of a long pause, like the end of a sentence, between each letter. And yes, I agree that "ignore" sounds a lot better than "skip". > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [SMTP:www-style-request@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 5:52 AM > To: Daniel Glazman > Cc: www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: Speak-Punctuation > > At 02:04 PM 12/08/99 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: > >Garth Wallace a écrit : > >> > >> It might make sense to add a "skip" value to > >> the speak-punctuation property, for use with > >> acronyms that nomally use periods, like "The > >> Man From U.N.C.L.E" > > > >Isn't > > > > The Man From <ACRONYM STYLE="speak-ponctuation : none"> > > U.N.C.L.E</ACRONYM> > > > >enough ? > > I don't think so. "speak-punctuation: none" says that punctuation is > rendered as "various pauses", which would make "U.N.C.L.E" sound quite > awkward. > > "ignore" might be a bit more clear of a value than "skip". > > -- > Liam Quinn > A Real Validator for Windows, http://arealvalidator.com/ > Web Design Group, http://www.htmlhelp.com/
Received on Thursday, 12 August 1999 14:03:33 UTC