- From: Rasmus Kaj <kaj@raditex.se>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:35:50 +0200
- To: dbaron@fas.harvard.edu
- Cc: ament@xs4all.nl, www-style@w3.org
- Cc: Rasmus Kaj <kaj@raditex.se>
>>>>> "LDB" == L David Baron <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu> writes:
LDB> On Mon, 09 Aug 1999 17:59:43 +0200, Rasmus Kaj (kaj@raditex.se) wrote:
a> <HMTL><BODY> TEXT IS NI<EM>C</EM>E </BODY></HTML>
>>
a> where normal text has a margin-left: 2em
a> and EM-text has a margin-left: 4em
>>
>> I assume:
>> BODY { display: block; }
>> EM { display: inline; }
>>
>> In this case, anonymous inline boxes should be created like this:
>>
>> <HTML><BODY><anon> TEXT IS NI</anon><EM>C</EM><anon>E
>> </anon></BODY></HTML>
LDB> That is what the spec says [1], but I don't think it makes much sense,
LDB> since it doesn't explain why the anon and em inline boxes should have
LDB> the same baseline. As I've said before [2], I think the following:
LDB> <HTML><BODY><anon> TEXT IS NI<EM>C</EM>E</anon></BODY></HTML>
LDB> makes much more sense, since the vertial-align: baseline (the typical
LDB> value) on the EM has a parent inline box to which it can align.
LDB> Otherwise, if, for example, EM had a computed font-size of 300% and
LDB> vertical-align of baseline, there would be nothing wrong with
LDB> formatting it as:
In [3] it is stated that the vertical-align values "only have meaning
with respect to a parent inline-level element, or to a parent
block-level element, if that element generates anonymous inline
boxes". Hence, in your example vertical-align has a meaning with
respect to the parent block-level element (which maybe should be
clearified to mean the actual line box).
Hence the following wold be correct with EM { vertical-align: top; }
LDB> TEXT IS NI|--E
LDB> |
LDB> |__
While this would normally be the only correct rendering:
LDB> |--
LDB> |
LDB> TEXT IS NI|__E
LDB> It would also give a much nicer way to describe the action of
LDB> line-height on a block-level element.
Hmm ... Maybe [4] could be made clearer? But onece the flow is broken
into line boxes, i think that [5] is quite clear. IOW, I don't think
this (how the anonymous boxes are generated) should be changed.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#anonymous
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jan/0027.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Mar/0121.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#line-box
[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visudet.html#line-height
--
Rasmus Kaj ---------------- rasmus@kaj.a.se - http://www.e.kth.se/~kaj/
\ Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bullshit before
\--------------------------------------------- http://www.Raditex.se/
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 1999 12:36:09 UTC