- From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 09:36:33 -0700
- To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>, "John Ky (HxG)" <z2206460@student.unsw.edu.au>, "STYLE" <www-style@w3.org>
Thus spake Frank Boumphrey: > em takes on a different meaning in CSS to the usual typographic >term. In Typography, 6em's=1 inch, You must be confusing em with pica. A pica is 12 points. There are six of them in an inch. Only in a 12-point font is a pica equivalent to an em. As for em as a "usual typographic term", there's no end of debate on the connection to the letter em. Jan Roland Eriksson has produced a nearly exhaustive treatment here: http://home2.swipnet.se/%7Ew-20547/stylework/typograph1-en.html#Ch23 ... yet he disputes any historical connection to the letter M. I've heard otherwise, and will recycle a little ascii art from usenet: It's my understanding that there is a relationship to the letter M, or rather, to the chunk of metal[1] upon which the raised face of the letter once typically sat: _________________ | |\ /| || |\ | | \ / | || . | \ | | \/ | || | | | | | | || | | | ---> "iM" | || | | ----------------- | \ \\ \| \ \\ \ ------------ --- Unlike most of the letters, which sat on narrower chunks of metal, the M's was square, at least for the most common designs of the letter M at an early point in printing history[2] (this was somewhat wider than current fashion has it). Thus the M's width served as a handy horizontal unit equivalent to the height of all the characters' chunks; i.e., for the nominal font size. "Em" came to mean, metonymically, this latter thing, even after the letter M began to be designed more narrowly.[3] [1] http://www.tiro.com/lead.gif [2] http://www.tiro.com/aen_rom.html [3] http://www.tiro.com/pla_rom.html > -----Original Message----- > From: John Ky (HxG) <z2206460@student.unsw.edu.au> > Also, the ex unit turned out to be slightly less than the >width of the 'x' character. As Frank noted, ex is universally misimplemented - as .5em. Last time I checked, NS also gave too large a value for em; i.e., representing 1 em as something more like 1.1em. __________________ Todd Fahrner mailto:fahrner@pobox.com http://www.verso.com/agitprop/
Received on Monday, 6 April 1998 12:30:25 UTC