- From: Jonas Salling <salling@cooper.xanthus.se>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:59:09 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
According to the CSS Positioning draft, absolutely positioned elements should be positioned relative to the innermost enclosing absolutely positioned block. It is NOT possible the have a statically positioned block define origin for its child elements. This is in my opinion a very unfortunate limitation. It makes it impossible to have a group of absolutely positioned elements (such as a short section of text with 2 columns layout) "embedded" in the general flow of text. To achieve these and similar effects, one is forced to make "all" elements absolutely positioned, which in turn makes it neccesary to move elements around to make room for other elements (as they grow bigger). Also, having all elements be absolutely positioned in this way, one is more or less forced to specify fixed font sizes to ensure elements won't overlap due to the user's stylesheet (or browser font settings). I'd suggest we introduce an additional property for block level elements: origin: parent | this (default value is parent) "parent" leaves it to the parent block to define origin for absolutely positioned child elements (the parent may in its turn leave the decision to its parent and so on) and "this" defines origin for child abs. positioned elements to be the upper left corner to the block having the "origin" property. What do you think? I don't think css positioning will be able to fully replace the use of tables unless this (or a similar) addition is made to the css positioning spec. If you're interested, I'll provide some example code to clarify what kind of effects I want to produce. Regards, Jonas Salling
Received on Thursday, 30 October 1997 09:59:35 UTC