- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 14:59:13 -0700
- To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>, www-style@w3.org
Unfortunately (and believe me, I do mean "unfortunately"), legacy rendering disagrees with you quite strongly. Try loading this in any version of Netscape Navigator or Internet Explorer: <B>This is bold. <TABLE><TR><TD> This is not bold. </TD></TR> </TABLE> This is bold again. </B> -Chris Chris Wilson cwilso@microsoft.com *** > -----Original Message----- > From: David Perrell [SMTP:davidp@earthlink.net] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 1997 1:08 PM > To: Chris Wilson (PSD); www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: CSS1 and tables > > Chris Wilson wrote: > > >...The choice we had was between > >allowing inheritance of ANY rendering properties into tables (and > >therefore, breaking the model we've had since the introduction of > >tables, and breaking compatibility with millions of pages), and > setting > >up a set of internal rules that reset those rendering properties on > >table cells. > > Internal rules resetting properties? I can see why you'd be in a > quandary > over how to fit a table into a default stylesheet. There are no > corresponding CSS1 properties for some of the HTML attributes. But a > table > inherits most of the font and text properties of its parent, doesn't > it? Why > would you need to override any inheritable properties except > text-align and > font-weight on TH and text-align on TD? > > David Perrell
Received on Monday, 6 October 1997 18:08:40 UTC