- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 11:36:11 -0800
- To: "Style" <www-style@w3.org>
Bravo to the authors for addressing finer contexts for contextual selectors[1]. But rather then dividing these into separate sections, shouldn't '6.4 Contextual selectors' be subdivided into '6.4.1 Ancestral selectors' and '6.4.2 Sequential selectors'? Also, I find the syntax for sequential selectors and the context-relative meaning of '~' to be confusing. It seems that the slashes constitute a kind of bracketing mechanism and that the tilde is sort of an 'immediate specificity-increaser', but that is not really clear from the draft. The logic of the double-slash indicating first child eludes me also. Maybe this is in part due to uncertainty as to whether 6.5 and 6.6 are mutually exclusive. 6.6 would make more sense if there were no 6.5. Would it not be easier to grok the syntax if the sequential selector were a single '/' for "following" and '//' for "immediately following"? E.g.: H1 / P { ... /* P following H1 */ H1 // P { ... /* P immediately following H1 */ DIV ~ P { ... /* P as any direct child of DIV DIV ~/ P {... /* P as first direct child of DIV */ DIV ~// P {... /* P as immediately-following first child of DIV */ David Perrell [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-CSS2/selector.html#h-6.4
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 1997 17:45:35 UTC