- From: Andrew n marshall <amarshal@usc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 01:05:46 -0800
- To: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
I haven't figured out a reasonable way to specify that an element should take up the remaining space, either horizontally or vertically. This is specifically related to positioning alongside a dynamic element, such as a sidebar who width is defined by the text it contains. Does it seem reasonable to have a value 'available' for properties 'height' and 'width'? This would solve my immediate problem, but it does explicitly describe what happens when two or more elements with "height/width:available;" occur in the same line/column. The simple solution involves splitting the space evenly. There is also the solution implemented by HTML <FRAME> tags: define a unit '*' to weight the division of the remaining space. This is more general, but also more difficult to implement (although most of it is already required to implement "alignment:justify;"). Any sort of 'remaining/available' setting is apt to have a profound effect on the rendering/positioning algorithm since it forces the document object tree to be traversed twice during rendering (first for normal width/height values, second to allocate remaining space and set final positions). Has this been thought of/discussed before? What are your the reactions? On a similar note, what to people think of adding the short-cut values of 'maximum' and 'minimum' to height and width? 'maximum' should mean: horizontal-visibility==visible ? max( min( width-max, width available ), width needed ) : min( width-max, width available ); and 'minimum' should mean: horizontal-visibility==visible ? max( width-min, width needed ) : width-min; Obviously similar values could be defined for height. (Note: horizontal-visibility was proposed in my last email. It is equivalent to the current visibility, but only applies to horizontal spacing) Andrew n marshall student - artist - programmer http://www.media-electronica.com/anm-bin/anm "Everyone a mentor, Everyone a pupil"
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 1997 04:05:29 UTC