- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:45:43 -0700
- To: "Paul Prescod" <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>, <www-style@w3.org>
Paul Prescod wrote: > >From what I know of most large organizations, they will want to define > the exact "extensions" that are allowed to the corporate stylesheet. > When a stylesheet is designed with extensions in mind I think that we > are talking about "parameterization". You invoke the stylesheet and > supply parameters such as departmental background, logo, etc. CSS > doesn't really allow parameterization except through cascading, but once > you open the cascading floodgates the central stylesheet maintainer > loses all control. Perhaps I'm all wet, but I don't see site maintenance being torrentially anarchized by cascading stylesheets. I was referring to documents styled for the department from which they're generated, not on-the-fly-customized for the requestor. Control over appearance is gained with a few centrally-controlled stylesheets, not lost. As for specifying stylesheets and elements based on parameters, that's getting pretty trivial using server-side scripting such as ASP. Though not necessary with SS-scripting, using external cascading stylesheets could still simplify maintenance. David Perrell
Received on Monday, 28 April 1997 17:56:45 UTC