- From: Clark Breyman <cbreyman@xsoft.xerox.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 15:04:10 PDT
- To: James Tauber <jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au>
- Cc: Hakon Lie <howcome@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
James Tauber wrote: > > > While my suggestion might be restated "Why don't we put a UUID in every > > web content object?", I thought it best to limit my suggestion to CSS > > as there is still the opportunity to influence the initial development > > of CSS enabled UA's. > > How about using ISO/IEC 9070 public identifiers? A simple solution exists > for resolving them to URLs (see http://www.entmp.org/fpi-urn/delgate.html) > and they are already used by DSSSL. (Infact, I'm currently putting > together a proposal to use them for Java classes as well). > > James K. Tauber / jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au > University CWIS Coordination Officer > The University of Western Australia Doesn't 9070 require registration? My original thought was simply to provide a key for efficient duplicate suppression and cache management, not to provide a backward map to the master location. If we require registration for UUIDs, that imposed a bottleneck on thier adoption. Something similar to a hostid (ethernet address) based UUIDGEN used in MSCOM or DCE would allow anyone with a net connection to just start using the mechanism. Clark Breyman ----------------------------------- Not nec. the opinions of my employer.
Received on Sunday, 19 May 1996 18:03:46 UTC