- From: Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 14:52:28 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
At 12:59p 05/19/96, Clark Breyman wrote: >Hakon Lie wrote: >> UAs should try to cache style sheets as they cache HTML documents >> today. Caching could be based on the URL of the style sheet, what are >> the argument for introducing UUIDs? > >While my suggestion might be restated "Why don't we put a UUID in every >web content object?", I thought it best to limit my suggestion to CSS >as there is still the opportunity to influence the initial development >of CSS enabled UA's. > >I agree that UA could cache style sheets as the cache HTML documents, >however URLs are not adequate as keys for caching. They indicate nothing >about the version of the content identified, whether it was copied for >somewhere else, etc. Think about the whole site replication issue - >something a URL based caching scheme could deal with, but a UUID caching >scheme could. In addition, my guess is that style sheets will become >reusable licensable elements like Java applets. A UUID-keyed caching >scheme would allow an author to publish a style sheet, multiple sites to >use it and the UA to recogize that reuse. How would you then handle this situation: * Author of published stylesheet modifies it. * Subscriber A wants any updates automatically. * Subscriber B want to stick with original. What do you do about the ID conflicts which will ensue? Do you assign a new ID every time the stylesheet is updated? Looks like a nightmare to me. A URL-based scheme would avoid conflicts -- just point to whichever stylesheet version you want. Version 1.0 is at URL x, version 1.1 is at URL y. __________________________________________________________________________ Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript, Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter
Received on Sunday, 19 May 1996 17:52:35 UTC