- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 11:18:03 -0700
- To: "'Steve Knoblock'" <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
- Cc: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
SGML comments are now a valid way to "hide" the <STYLE> contents from
non-conformant browsers, as decided by the W3C. CSS has its own
commenting mechanism - basically, just use C comments ( /* like this */
), and the stylesheet handler will ignore the contents. Right now, the
stylesheet parser is expected to parse <STYLE> data that is inside SGML
comments, so it's picking up "red letter day" in the example below as
being part of the selector.
-Chris
Chris Wilson
cwilso@microsoft.com
-[-
>----------
>From: Steve Knoblock[SMTP:knoblock@worldnet.att.net]
>Sent: Monday, June 17, 1996 10:35 AM
>To: Chris Wilson (PSD)
>Subject: RE: LINK'ed style sheets
>
>One other thing,
>I noticed that any comment in the <style></style> containter caused the
>style sheet to not apply.
>Like
><!-- red letter day -->
><style>
>p {
> color: red;
>}
></style>
>
>It would help to have comments in style sheets.
>
>Steve
>
>At 04:55 PM 6/17/96 +0000, you wrote:
>>You can also surround the contents of the <STYLE>-contained embedded
>>stylesheet with comments, similar to the <SCRIPT> commenting procedure.
>>E.g.,
>>
>><STYLE>
>><!--
>>H1 { text-decoration: underline; color: blue }
>>P { color: red }
>>-->
>></STYLE>
>>
>>Planned implementation is, I believe, to apply <LINK>ed stylesheets
>>automatically, but allow the user to selectively turn them off.
>>Comments on this plan are welcome.
>>
>> -Chris
>>Chris Wilson
>>cwilso@microsoft.com
>>-[-
>>
>>>----------
>>>From: mseaton@pobox.com[SMTP:mseaton@pobox.com]
>>>Sent: Sunday, June 16, 1996 11:34 AM
>>>To: www-style@w3.org
>>>Subject: Re: LINK'ed style sheets
>>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Style/css/msie/link.htm:
>>>> In MS IE 3.0 beta 1, a style sheet referenced through the LINK element
>>>> will automatically be applied to a document. However, according to
>>> ^^^^^^^^^ ^^
>>>> the specification, the LINK element should be used to refer to
>>> ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> alternative style sheets that the user can select. If you style
>>>>sheets to
>>>> be automatically applied, the @import .. construct within the
>>>> STYLE element is better:
>>>
>>>Here is the actual wording:
>>>
>>>: Authors can use LINK elements to offer readers a choice of style
>>>sheets,
>>>: e.g:
>>>
>>>: <LINK TITLE="Old" REL=stylesheet HREF="old.style"
>>>TYPE="application/dsssl">
>>>
>>>: <LINK TITLE="New" REL=stylesheet HREF="new.style"
>>>TYPE="application/rtf">
>>>: <LINK TITLE="Wacky" REL=stylesheet HREF="wacky.style"
>>>TYPE="text/css">
>>>
>>>Nowhere does it say that <STYLE> *must* be used for a style sheet to be
>>>
>>>automatically applied. I also feel it would be foolish to insist on
>>>this, as
>>><STYLE> results in the style sheet appearing as gibberish at the start
>>>of the
>>>page on browsers that do not support it, while <LINK rel=stylesheet> is
>>>simply
>>>ignored.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Michael Seaton (mseaton@inforamp.net)
>>>
>>>
>>
>_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
>
> _/ City Gallery - History of Photography
>
> http://www.webcom.com/cityg
>
> _/ PhotoGen - Photography and Genealogy Mailing List
> http://genealogy.org/~mangold
>
>_/ Member: National Stereoscopic Association
> http://www.tisco.com/3d-web/nsa/nsa.htm
>
> Steve Knoblock
> Webmaster/Listowner
> knoblock@worldnet.att.net
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 17 June 1996 14:18:21 UTC