- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 09:55:29 -0700
- To: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>, "'mseaton@pobox.com'" <mseaton@pobox.com>
You can also surround the contents of the <STYLE>-contained embedded stylesheet with comments, similar to the <SCRIPT> commenting procedure. E.g., <STYLE> <!-- H1 { text-decoration: underline; color: blue } P { color: red } --> </STYLE> Planned implementation is, I believe, to apply <LINK>ed stylesheets automatically, but allow the user to selectively turn them off. Comments on this plan are welcome. -Chris Chris Wilson cwilso@microsoft.com -[- >---------- >From: mseaton@pobox.com[SMTP:mseaton@pobox.com] >Sent: Sunday, June 16, 1996 11:34 AM >To: www-style@w3.org >Subject: Re: LINK'ed style sheets > >http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Style/css/msie/link.htm: >> In MS IE 3.0 beta 1, a style sheet referenced through the LINK element >> will automatically be applied to a document. However, according to > ^^^^^^^^^ ^^ >> the specification, the LINK element should be used to refer to > ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> alternative style sheets that the user can select. If you style sheets to >> be automatically applied, the @import .. construct within the >> STYLE element is better: > >Here is the actual wording: > >: Authors can use LINK elements to offer readers a choice of style >sheets, >: e.g: > >: <LINK TITLE="Old" REL=stylesheet HREF="old.style" >TYPE="application/dsssl"> > >: <LINK TITLE="New" REL=stylesheet HREF="new.style" >TYPE="application/rtf"> >: <LINK TITLE="Wacky" REL=stylesheet HREF="wacky.style" >TYPE="text/css"> > >Nowhere does it say that <STYLE> *must* be used for a style sheet to be > >automatically applied. I also feel it would be foolish to insist on >this, as ><STYLE> results in the style sheet appearing as gibberish at the start >of the >page on browsers that do not support it, while <LINK rel=stylesheet> is >simply >ignored. > >-- >Michael Seaton (mseaton@inforamp.net) > >
Received on Monday, 17 June 1996 12:55:20 UTC