For all you
<img src=0 width=50 height=20> implementation proponents,
wouldn't it make much more sense to just have

<img width=50 height=20> ?

Why specify this ambiguous src=0 that would be interpretted as
a URL or file?

Or does not having a src break some rules?

(Hehe... not like anyone's actually proposing this as a real
solution or anything... just a point of curiousity...)


Received on Tuesday, 2 July 1996 20:54:14 UTC