Re: IMG

• From: Jonathan Stark <jks@uiuc.edu>
• Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 20:05:15 -0500 (CDT)
• To: www-style@w3.org
• Message-Id: <199607030105.UAA18686@ampere.scale.uiuc.edu>

For all you
<img src=0 width=50 height=20> implementation proponents,
wouldn't it make much more sense to just have

<img width=50 height=20> ?

Why specify this ambiguous src=0 that would be interpretted as
a URL or file?

Or does not having a src break some rules?

(Hehe... not like anyone's actually proposing this as a real
solution or anything... just a point of curiousity...)

Jonathan

Received on Tuesday, 2 July 1996 20:54:14 UTC