- From: Mike Meyer <mwm@contessa.phone.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 11:31:54 PST
- To: www-style@www10.w3.org
> From: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr> > Mike Batchelor writes: > > text/stylesheet; version=css (extension .css) > > text/stylesheet; version=dsssl (extension .dsssl or .dss) > > text/stylesheet; version=viola (extension .ora or .viola) > style/css > style/dsssl > style/viola > > It will probably be tougher to establish style as a main type (does > anyone have recent experiences with IANA on this?), and it may > encourage diversion rather than standardization. Is this good or bad? Since these seem to be pretty clearly in the application class, maybe it should be: application/css-stylesheet application/dssl-stylesheet application/viola-stylesheet On the other hand, a main type for "extra information" that one would expect to be included in an object makes sense. Other examples might include fonts, color maps for images, and probably others. <mike
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 1995 14:41:36 UTC