- From: Paul Rohr <paul@rafiki.spyglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 12:23:01 -0600
- To: cwilso@microsoft.com
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
At 09:26 AM 12/8/95 -0800, cwilso@microsoft.com wrote: >Chris Lilley wrote (in response to Scott E. Preece): >>So, in the interests of wrapping up - and knowing that you are unable to >>attend WWW4, which is a pity as this issue will surely be discussed - >>I would like to ask your opinion. If you could be there, and it came >>to a vote, would you raise a blocking objection if the proposed STYLE >>attribute was dropped, or constrained to point to a named style only? > >I will be at WWW4, and I also object to removing the proposed STYLE >attribute or constraining it to point to a named style only. Ditto. -- Paul Rohr Software Engineer Spyglass, Inc. Make The Net Work(TM)
Received on Friday, 8 December 1995 13:24:30 UTC