- From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 1995 22:04:28 -0500
- To: cwilso@microsoft.com
- Cc: <mjhanna@sandia.gov>, <www-style@w3.org>, <html-wg@oclc.org>
At 04:42 PM 12/6/95 -0800, cwilso@microsoft.com wrote: >I'm a little unclear on why it is desirable to separate CLASS and a >classification of style - Michael, could you explain this? In the limited >instances where stylistic information should be set on a class of objects >that already belong to a larger CLASS (denoted by attribute) or to disparate >CLASSes, it would seem that ID could be set. CLASS is a way of semantically subclassing elements. Applying a style is just one reason you would want to subclass an element. Creating CLASSes with types of "big" or "blue" or "five_point" are just as bad as creating elements named "<BIG>" or "<FONT>". If you absolutely must put style information directly in your HTML document, and that style information does not correspond to a semantic subclass, then you should use some other attribute, such as STYLE. I am not entirely in favour of STYLE especially a STYLE that allows direct application of arbitrary style sheet directives, but I am certainly against using CLASS for that. Paul Prescod
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 1995 22:05:19 UTC