- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:10:44 -0500
- To: "Jack Jansen" <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Cc: www-smil@w3.org, cam@mcc.id.au
- Message-ID: <da131fde0805140910y5bab2fabmd07b2b8dc10fbb04@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jack and SYMM WG, Can we have a response on this - would it be possible to include a mention of the SMIL Timesheet feature string in the Timesheet spec and a reference to the DOM hasFeature method? Seems like http://www.w3.org/2007/07/SMIL30/Timesheets would make the most sense. Thanks, Jeff On 4/8/08, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jack, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-5CED94D7 is the DOM > hasFeature method. It mentions how the SVG did things, which is here: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature.html and > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdom.html#FeatureStrings > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote: > >> >> On 8 apr 2008, at 07:50, Jeff Schiller wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Cameraon for the suggestion. >>> >>> SYMM Working Group, >>> >>> Can we have a response on this? I think the feature string hasFeature() >>> check is a good idea, but the feature string would need to be defined in the >>> spec. "org.w3.smil.timesheet" ? >>> >> >> >> Jeff, >> do you have examples of other specs that have such a reference? The >> suggested functionality sounds pretty useful, but it would fall under a >> "best practices" or "integration suggestions" heading, and we haven't done >> such before... >> -- >> Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack<http://www.cwi.nl/%7Ejack> >> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma >> Goldman >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 16:11:30 UTC