- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:42:07 -0500
- To: "Jack Jansen" <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Cc: www-smil@w3.org, cam@mcc.id.au
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 13:53:06 UTC
Jack, http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-5CED94D7 is the DOM hasFeature method. It mentions how the SVG did things, which is here: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature.html and http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdom.html#FeatureStrings Regards, Jeff On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote: > > On 8 apr 2008, at 07:50, Jeff Schiller wrote: > > > Thanks, Cameraon for the suggestion. > > > > SYMM Working Group, > > > > Can we have a response on this? I think the feature string hasFeature() > > check is a good idea, but the feature string would need to be defined in the > > spec. "org.w3.smil.timesheet" ? > > > > > Jeff, > do you have examples of other specs that have such a reference? The > suggested functionality sounds pretty useful, but it would fall under a > "best practices" or "integration suggestions" heading, and we haven't done > such before... > -- > Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack<http://www.cwi.nl/%7Ejack> > If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma > Goldman > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 13:53:06 UTC