- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:36:40 +0100
- To: "Shawn M. Jones" <smj@littleprojects.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-validator@w3.org
http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf This morning I rebooted and this was still in Firefox - I got the same error message, except at byte 31594. Same for a handful of retries. Very odd! Downloading the file with curl and running it through rapper -c says 503 triples. The validator works fine on a copy of the file I put at; http://hyperdata.org/misc/lostfoaf.rdf The validator at: http://validator.w3.org/ reports Well-formed XML Looking at the file, the only thing that I could see that might possibly cause problems was an unescaped '&' in a comment - I can't remember XML well enough to know if that's officially a problem (but the w3c validator doesn't seem to think so...). On 5 March 2011 05:59, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote: > At first I smacked my head in embarrassment thinking I shouldn't work so late. I did as you suggested, but now I get a similar message. > > An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 30146 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) > > The same file on a different server at URI (http://www.cs.odu.edu/~sjone/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf) produces "Your RDF document validated successfully." > > I ensured that the content type for rdf files was set to "application/rdf+xml". Are there any other server settings I need to be aware of for publishing RDF content? > > Thanks, > > Shawn M. Jones > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Danny Ayers wrote: > >> Changing lostfoaf..rdf to lostfoaf.rdf produces a 'valid' message >> >> On 4 March 2011 05:29, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote: >>> report=I'm completely baffled as to what the problem could be. This RDF document is available at two URIs. Using one URI gives no errors, using the other gives >>> >>> An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf..rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 0 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) >>> >>> The only difference is the server, which returns Content-Type: application/rdf+xml for each document, so I'm confused as to what could be causing the validator to find "undecodable data". >>> RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://danny.ayers.name > > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 08:37:13 UTC