- From: Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:59:39 -0500
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-validator@w3.org
At first I smacked my head in embarrassment thinking I shouldn't work so late. I did as you suggested, but now I get a similar message. An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 30146 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) The same file on a different server at URI (http://www.cs.odu.edu/~sjone/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf) produces "Your RDF document validated successfully." I ensured that the content type for rdf files was set to "application/rdf+xml". Are there any other server settings I need to be aware of for publishing RDF content? Thanks, Shawn M. Jones On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Danny Ayers wrote: > Changing lostfoaf..rdf to lostfoaf.rdf produces a 'valid' message > > On 4 March 2011 05:29, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote: >> report=I'm completely baffled as to what the problem could be. This RDF document is available at two URIs. Using one URI gives no errors, using the other gives >> >> An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf..rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 0 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) >> >> The only difference is the server, which returns Content-Type: application/rdf+xml for each document, so I'm confused as to what could be causing the validator to find "undecodable data". >> RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 05:00:13 UTC