Re: Form Post from Firefox

Still puzzled, so I threw a little script at the file - attached -
still can't see anything the matter.

Any problems with other files on the same server?

On 5 March 2011 09:36, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf
>
> This morning I rebooted and this was still in Firefox - I got the same
> error message, except at byte 31594. Same for a handful of retries.
>
> Very odd!
>
> Downloading the file with curl and running it through rapper -c says
> 503 triples.
>
> The validator works fine on a copy of the file I put at;
> http://hyperdata.org/misc/lostfoaf.rdf
>
> The validator at:
> http://validator.w3.org/
>
> reports Well-formed XML
>
> Looking at the file, the only thing that I could see that might
> possibly cause problems was an unescaped '&' in a comment - I can't
> remember XML well enough to know if that's officially a problem (but
> the w3c validator doesn't seem to think so...).
>
> On 5 March 2011 05:59, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote:
>> At first I smacked my head in embarrassment thinking I shouldn't work so late.  I did as you suggested, but now I get a similar message.
>>
>>        An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 30146 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.)
>>
>> The same file on a different server at URI (http://www.cs.odu.edu/~sjone/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf.rdf) produces "Your RDF document validated successfully."
>>
>> I ensured that the content type for rdf files was set to "application/rdf+xml".  Are there any other server settings I need to be aware of for publishing RDF content?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Shawn M. Jones
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>>
>>> Changing lostfoaf..rdf to lostfoaf.rdf produces a 'valid' message
>>>
>>> On 4 March 2011 05:29, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote:
>>>> report=I'm completely baffled as to what the problem could be.  This RDF document is available at two URIs.  Using one URI gives no errors, using the other gives
>>>>
>>>> An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf..rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 0 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.)
>>>>
>>>> The only difference is the server, which returns Content-Type: application/rdf+xml for each document, so I'm confused as to what could be causing the validator to find "undecodable data".
>>>> RDF=<?xml version="1.0">
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://danny.ayers.name
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://danny.ayers.name
>



-- 
http://danny.ayers.name