- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:02:25 +0100
- To: "Shawn M. Jones" <smj@littleprojects.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-validator@w3.org
Changing lostfoaf..rdf to lostfoaf.rdf produces a 'valid' message On 4 March 2011 05:29, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote: > report=I'm completely baffled as to what the problem could be. This RDF document is available at two URIs. Using one URI gives no errors, using the other gives > > An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf..rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 0 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) > > The only difference is the server, which returns Content-Type: application/rdf+xml for each document, so I'm confused as to what could be causing the validator to find "undecodable data". > RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> > > > > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 17:03:00 UTC