Changing lostfoaf..rdf to lostfoaf.rdf produces a 'valid' message On 4 March 2011 05:29, Shawn M. Jones <smj@littleprojects.org> wrote: > report=I'm completely baffled as to what the problem could be. This RDF document is available at two URIs. Using one URI gives no errors, using the other gives > > An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://www.littleprojects.org/~smj/courses/cs751-s11/assignment2/lostfoaf..rdf' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 0 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) > > The only difference is the server, which returns Content-Type: application/rdf+xml for each document, so I'm confused as to what could be causing the validator to find "undecodable data". > RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> > > > > -- http://danny.ayers.nameReceived on Friday, 4 March 2011 17:03:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 20:17:01 UTC