- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:55:43 +0200
- To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
> The stuff at W3C is a submission to W3C. W3C has not yet started any > activity in this space, so no other documents have been produced by W3C in > this area, as far as I know. > > The most recent stuff on SWRL produced by the Joint Committee can be found > at > http://www.daml.org/rules/ > Version 0.6 there is very close to the submission to W3C. > > The Joint Committee is still active so there is the chance that any > problems in version 0.6 of SWRL will be fixed. Ok, I will use the Daml website as my point of reference, thanks. -Rinke > > peter > > [[Yes, this doesn't answer your technical point.]] > > > From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl> > Subject: Probable bug in swrl.owl > Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:07:15 +0200 > > >>Hi All, >> >>I just stumbled upon a bug in the swrl.owl file downloadable at >>http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/swrl.owl (this is the version >>submitted to the W3C). The swrl:argument2 property is defined as an >>rdf:Property instead of an owl:ObjectProperty. >> >>It could be that this has already been fixed, but it's quite hard to >>find the latest version of any SWRL-related document (to be honest): >>where should I look? >> >>Regards, >> >> Rinke Hoekstra >> >> >>-- >>-------------------------------------- >>Rinke Hoekstra hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl >>T: +31-20-5253499 F: +31-20-5253495 >>Leibniz Center for Law, Law Faculty >>University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 >>1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands >>-------------------------------------- -- -------------------------------------- Rinke Hoekstra hoekstra@lri.jur.uva.nl T: +31-20-5253499 F: +31-20-5253495 Leibniz Center for Law, Law Faculty University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands --------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 07:55:47 UTC