- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:22:07 -0600
- To: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 13:00, Drew McDermott wrote: > Hayes wrote: > Its not a matter of alternatives. If you want to > draw checkable valid conclusions, then you need > to do this kind of reasoning. > > I don't want to draw checkable valid conclusions. I suggest that checkable valid conclusions are essential to anarchic scalability. I wish I could elaborate, but I'm juggling too many things just now. I hope you don't mind my using your inboxes to bookmark my thought. The relevant wiki nodes are these, though I don't think they make my point quite yet either: http://esw.w3.org/topic/AnarchicScalability http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebBus -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 13:22:08 UTC