- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 10:40:42 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
>On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 09:29, McBride, Brian wrote: >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org >> > [mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly >> > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 2:17 PM >> > To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org >> > Subject: transition www-rdf-logic to public-owl-dev? >> > >> > >> > Jim H. has been workin on an OWL homepage... >> > http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/ >> > >> > and it got me thinking about creating a public-owl-dev >> > mailing list, ala xmlschema-dev >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/ >> >> Public-sw-dev or is there reason to make it owl specific? I had the same thought. I'd suggest that if we have an explicit reference to a language then lets keep it being RDF rather than OWL. But using the 'SW' trope would be better. On the other hand, is this actually broken right now? Why fix it? Pat > >Umm... for the same reasons we have an OWL recommendation >and not a semantic web recommendation, I suppose. > >> Brian >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >see you at the WWW2004 in NY 15-21 May? -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 11:40:56 UTC