- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:40:20 +0100
- To: <mm@mmrecht.com>, "Www-Rdf-Logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Thanks, but yesterday & today I'm getting a DNS error on that address. --- Danny Ayers <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> >-----Original Message----- >From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org >[mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Murk Muller >Sent: 14 January 2002 13:02 >To: Www-Rdf-Logic >Subject: Re: model-model mapping > > >Dear Danny, > >have a look at http://rdf.dictionary.de on the "legal rdf >dictionary". In a >technical sense it is not in a developed stage yet, but from a >methodological >perspective it may have to offer something for your purposes. > >Murk Muller > >Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2002 23:10 schrieb Danny Ayers: >> Could anyone please point me in the direction of any work done on ways of >> mapping between different vocabularies, schemas and their models. There's >> obviously been a fair bit of work been done on things like mapping RDBMS >> schema to XML schema or object models, but what I'm after is a more >> generic, 'meta' form of this. Terms like 'equivalentTo' would >work in this >> context, but what would be really nice would be to find a whole >RDF Schema >> in this space ;-) >> >> The particular application I have in mind only needs a narrow aspect of >> this >> >> : more or less one-to-one mapping between an arbitrary domain-specific >> : graph >> >> based model (such as that of a hierarchical organisation) and a >> general-case graph (just nodes & arcs here), but the ability to map from >> one model to another enables the reasoning facilities (i.e. >algorithms) of >> the second model to be applied to the first, which is an approach that >> strikes me as being ideal for SW work, but rather neglected (ok, this is >> something that is done a lot through the back door, e.g. using the Rete >> algorithm in Jess plugged into from Protege, but the mapping is, >> meta-speaking, usually hard-coded). If I do have to come up with my own >> RDFS, then it might as well be based on a reasonably general case (rather >> than the feeble attempts I've tried so far). >> >> Cheers, >> Danny. >> >> --- >> >> Danny Ayers >> <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> >
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 06:44:11 UTC