- From: Murk Muller <mmuller@snafu.de>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 13:02:04 +0100
- To: "Www-Rdf-Logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Dear Danny, have a look at http://rdf.dictionary.de on the "legal rdf dictionary". In a technical sense it is not in a developed stage yet, but from a methodological perspective it may have to offer something for your purposes. Murk Muller Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2002 23:10 schrieb Danny Ayers: > Could anyone please point me in the direction of any work done on ways of > mapping between different vocabularies, schemas and their models. There's > obviously been a fair bit of work been done on things like mapping RDBMS > schema to XML schema or object models, but what I'm after is a more > generic, 'meta' form of this. Terms like 'equivalentTo' would work in this > context, but what would be really nice would be to find a whole RDF Schema > in this space ;-) > > The particular application I have in mind only needs a narrow aspect of > this > > : more or less one-to-one mapping between an arbitrary domain-specific > : graph > > based model (such as that of a hierarchical organisation) and a > general-case graph (just nodes & arcs here), but the ability to map from > one model to another enables the reasoning facilities (i.e. algorithms) of > the second model to be applied to the first, which is an approach that > strikes me as being ideal for SW work, but rather neglected (ok, this is > something that is done a lot through the back door, e.g. using the Rete > algorithm in Jess plugged into from Protege, but the mapping is, > meta-speaking, usually hard-coded). If I do have to come up with my own > RDFS, then it might as well be based on a reasonably general case (rather > than the feeble attempts I've tried so far). > > Cheers, > Danny. > > --- > > Danny Ayers > <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 07:01:51 UTC