- From: Murk Muller <mm@mmrecht.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:12:40 +0100
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Cc: "Www-Rdf-Logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
oops, no wonder, such a URL does not exist. The right one is: http://rdf.lexml.de , apologies. Murk At 12:40 15.01.02 +0100, you wrote: >Thanks, but yesterday & today I'm getting a DNS error on that address. > >--- > >Danny Ayers ><stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org >>[mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Murk Muller >>Sent: 14 January 2002 13:02 >>To: Www-Rdf-Logic >>Subject: Re: model-model mapping >> >> >>Dear Danny, >> >>have a look at http://rdf.dictionary.de on the "legal rdf >>dictionary". In a >>technical sense it is not in a developed stage yet, but from a >>methodological >>perspective it may have to offer something for your purposes. >> >>Murk Muller >> >>Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2002 23:10 schrieb Danny Ayers: >>> Could anyone please point me in the direction of any work done on ways of >>> mapping between different vocabularies, schemas and their models. There's >>> obviously been a fair bit of work been done on things like mapping RDBMS >>> schema to XML schema or object models, but what I'm after is a more >>> generic, 'meta' form of this. Terms like 'equivalentTo' would >>work in this >>> context, but what would be really nice would be to find a whole >>RDF Schema >>> in this space ;-) >>> >>> The particular application I have in mind only needs a narrow aspect of >>> this >>> >>> : more or less one-to-one mapping between an arbitrary domain-specific >>> : graph >>> >>> based model (such as that of a hierarchical organisation) and a >>> general-case graph (just nodes & arcs here), but the ability to map from >>> one model to another enables the reasoning facilities (i.e. >>algorithms) of >>> the second model to be applied to the first, which is an approach that >>> strikes me as being ideal for SW work, but rather neglected (ok, this is >>> something that is done a lot through the back door, e.g. using the Rete >>> algorithm in Jess plugged into from Protege, but the mapping is, >>> meta-speaking, usually hard-coded). If I do have to come up with my own >>> RDFS, then it might as well be based on a reasonably general case (rather >>> than the feeble attempts I've tried so far). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Danny. >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Danny Ayers >>> <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:11:25 UTC