- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:47:44 +0100
- To: Christopher Schmidt <crschmidt@crschmidt.net>
- Cc: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>From a modelling point of view, the container/collection side of both RSS 1.0 and 1.1 do seem a little troublesome. I'll pass on figuring out the details here ;-) But both express membership and order in a way that to me doesn't seem to fit very well with the domain model, which seems generally to be what's at the feed URI at a given point in time is a sliding window onto the conceptual feed comprised of all items (ever). An early question - the 1.1 spec says "order of the [items] child elements is significant" - but what is the significance (bearing in mind that most RSS 1.0 feeds incorporate a dc:date)? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:05:08 UTC