RE: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL

Looking good.

Two comments:

1. Please note the new, preferred URI for the CBD definition:

   http://www.w3.org/Submission/CBD/


2. Regarding typed literals, it would be good to see at least one 
   example showing a pattern matching a typed literal of an arbitrary
   datatype. E.g. given

   @prefix ex: <http://example.com/>
   ex:someResource ex:someProperty "xyz"^^ex:blargh .

   then

   PREFIX  ex:  <http://example.com/>
   SELECT ?s WHERE ( ?s ?p "xyz"^^ex:blargh )

   produces the results

                   s
   -----------------------------------
     http://example.com/someResource


Regards,

Patrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext 
> Seaborne, Andy
> Sent: 13 October, 2004 17:09
> To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The RDF Data Access Working Group is happy to announce the 
> first working
> draft of the query language part of its work:
> 
>    SPARQL RDF query language
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
> 
> The Working Group is soliciting feedback on this early draft from
> potential users, application writers, implementers, and any 
> other people
> interested in the Semantic Web.  Especially welcome are 
> general comments
> on the approach being taken and on the feature set of the language.
> 
> Please send email to mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> 
>       Andy
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 12:20:06 UTC