- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:38:12 +0200
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- CC: "'Graham Klyne'" <GK@ninebynine.org>, "'Danny Ayers'" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, rdfweb-dev@vapours.rdfweb.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, semanticweb@yahoogroups.com, rss-dev@yahoogroups.com, atom-syntax@imc.org, sean@mysterylights.com
I guess defining a RDF model that unambiguously maps to the atomXML model should be feasible, wasn't Sean B. Palmer been working on this? So why not regard AtomXML as a special serialization of RDF using Atom-Vocabulary (whith other conditions, like that there is exactly one resource in the model which is not an object of statement, that this resource is of type X, etc.)? (Kind of what vcard is for vcard-rdf). Cheers, reto Jon Hanna wrote: > Any sufficiently ambitious attempt to describe resources in XML eventually > becomes a buggy version of RDF/XML with poor handling of edge-cases. > > (It's the dark side of the principle of independent invention.) > > Regards, > Jon Hanna > <http://www.selkieweb.com/> > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 16:44:56 UTC