- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:01:19 +0100
- To: "'Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com'" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
- Cc: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
This has come up again recently on public-esw-thes@w3.org also. Re keeping concepts and documents disjoint, see [1][2]. Re working around limitations of sURI see [3]. Al. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0012.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0032.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0016.html --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com > Sent: 08 October 2004 11:46 > To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" > resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic > web... > > > > > > I draw the SWBP WG's attention to some comments which I feel > are relevant to the WG's activities: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Oct/0086.html > > Regards, > > Patrick > >
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 15:01:53 UTC