- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sf.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:48:21 +0000
- To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Uche, Uche Ogbuji writes: > On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 02:04, Phil Dawes wrote: > > Uche Ogbuji writes: > > > > Using an IFP - e.g. foaf:mbox. > > > > > > Hmm. My problem is that in the real, muddy world, I think > > > machine-automated merging is going to run into many more ontological > > > problems than you can throw a few OWL gimmicks at. > > > > > > Just ditch the idea: it's not in the least bit practical. *People* will > > > always be needed to sort out context, Semantic Web or no. I think that > > > once one accepts that, all these semiotic contrivances become easily > > > seen for the nonsense they are. > > > > > > > Actually I've been finding it very practical (at least working in an > > intranet environment). Of course you're right - people do need to sort > > out context, but they also need to be able to do this on a large scale. > > "intranet environment" is a closed system. For some reason you snipped > the part where I said that it *is* perfectly practical in closed systems > where the symbols can be controlled by management and policy. > Umm.. Apologies if you think I mis-quoted you, but I can't find any reference to you saying that in the email I replied to. Never mind. The point I was trying to make was that, yes, people are required to sort out context, but that once they've decided that they are able to use a set of symbols to mean something (within an acceptable margin of error in the outcome), OWL gimmicks like IFP etc.. are very useful in smushing/processing the data. > "intranet environment" is not "the real, muddy world", which is where I > said machine merging magic is impractical (because there is no centrally > controlled grounding of symbols). But machine merging magic is driven by people based on context. I'd be surprised if anybody thought otherwise. Also note that even in a closed system with policy etc.. symbols still squew. Even the owner of a symbol may use it to mean different things in different contexts. (e.g. http://databaseteam/Server meaning 'computer server' vs 'computer server that the database team manage' depending on context). Cheers, Phil
Received on Friday, 1 October 2004 08:43:51 UTC