- From: Andrew Newman <andrew@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 09:14:13 +1000
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Andrew Newman wrote: > > Seaborne, Andy wrote: > >> Imy hope is that implementations are relaxed about what they accept. >> >> My current test suite covers old and new syntactic forms for backwards >> compatibility: >> http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/rdql-tests-jena-2.1a.zip >> >> Check http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/ as later versions appear. >> >> > > The distinction in QNames is a nice feature - so good that it's worth > stealing (or reimplmenting) into iTQL. > > Kowari's implementation of RDQL passes the set of tests distributed with > Jena 2.1 which was confusingly called "rdql-tests-jena-2.0.zip". I'm > not sure what the differences are between that and the one linked. > I made a mistake here that might have given the wrong impression (not intentionally). I meant "parsers the set of tests" not "passes". The tests have xsd:string in them which is not a currently supported data type in Kowari.
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 19:14:39 UTC