- From: Andrew Newman <andrew@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 05:54:46 +1000
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Imy hope is that implementations are relaxed about what they accept. > > My current test suite covers old and new syntactic forms for backwards > compatibility: > http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/rdql-tests-jena-2.1a.zip > > Check http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/ as later versions appear. > > The distinction in QNames is a nice feature - so good that it's worth stealing (or reimplmenting) into iTQL. Kowari's implementation of RDQL passes the set of tests distributed with Jena 2.1 which was confusingly called "rdql-tests-jena-2.0.zip". I'm not sure what the differences are between that and the one linked.
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 15:55:02 UTC