Re: Real data

Sandro Hawke wrote:
> So where are you thinking you'll serve the RDF?
> would be obvious, but including the ".rdf" in the URI for the protien
> itself doesn't seem right.

The default representation if no extension is specified is a normal web 
page. I guess you could try to do something with content negotiation, 
but I'd rather not rely on that. On the other hand the page could 
include something like:

     rel="alternate" type="application/rdf+xml"

Haven't given that much thought yet.

Note that if you actually entered, 
you would be forwarded to some other site that is capable of serving the 
resource. Since these URLs are not really as stable as they should be, I 
prefer to use URNs for identifying resources, e.g.

This also avoids confusion with users who always expect a URL to be 

Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2004 14:01:54 UTC