- From: Hammond, Tony (ELSLON) <T.Hammond@elsevier.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:08:39 -0000
- To: 'Patrick Stickler' <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, ext Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> But as a first step (or even only step) the approach you've adopted > is IMO the way to go, and leaves the door open to adding functionality > in the future. We adhere to the "less is more" school for reasons of scalability, discoverability, etc., as previously argued. There really is more to URI as a naming architecture than HTTP alone. ;) Note also that we are registering namespaces under INFO - not minting identifiers. It is the /users/ of INFO URIs that get to mint the identifiers. We do not control the identifiers so cannot - nor want to - provide any resolution system. Tony
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 07:34:15 UTC