Re: named graphs

Phil Dawes wrote:

> Chris Bizer writes:
>  > 
>  > The current status quo of the trix work is described in
>  > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Apr/att-0081/PID-FAFPGYHS-1081860211.pdf
>  > 
> 
> Wow! I'm glad I asked the question or I wouldn't have seen this - just
> what I was looking for.

Thanks for the endorsement - if you want to find a rationale for any 
part you might find something in www-archive (Mar and Apr), I think we 
were about half the traffic.
I repeat that this is still far off stable.



> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Phil
> 
> P.S. For anybody who hasn't seen this yet: It covers named graph
> semantics, syntaxes, and querying, and then goes on to offer
> mechanisms and approaches for effective semantic web publishing -
> trust, signatures, documenting intent and a strategy for consuming
> information and deciding what to accept. I'd urge anybody with an
> interest in the semantic web to read it.
> 
> 

Jeremy