W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2004

Re: named graphs

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 21:21:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4092B532.2040608@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Phil Dawes wrote:

> Chris Bizer writes:
>  > 
>  > The current status quo of the trix work is described in
>  > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Apr/att-0081/PID-FAFPGYHS-1081860211.pdf
>  > 
> Wow! I'm glad I asked the question or I wouldn't have seen this - just
> what I was looking for.

Thanks for the endorsement - if you want to find a rationale for any 
part you might find something in www-archive (Mar and Apr), I think we 
were about half the traffic.
I repeat that this is still far off stable.

> Many thanks,
> Phil
> P.S. For anybody who hasn't seen this yet: It covers named graph
> semantics, syntaxes, and querying, and then goes on to offer
> mechanisms and approaches for effective semantic web publishing -
> trust, signatures, documenting intent and a strategy for consuming
> information and deciding what to accept. I'd urge anybody with an
> interest in the semantic web to read it.

Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 16:22:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:49 UTC