- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:55:49 +0300
- To: "ext LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" <james.lynn@hp.com>, "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On 2003-09-29 17:11, "ext LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" <james.lynn@hp.com> wrote: >> E.g. >> >> <#me> ex:myFriend _:x . >> _:x ex:emailAddress <mailto:somebody@example.com> . >> >> etc. but not >> >> <#me> ex:myFriend <mailto:somebody@example.com> . >> >> where it becomes ambiguous whether your friend is a >> person or a mailbox ;-) > > In the interest of economy, is there a way to have the meaning of the first > statement and the brevity of the second? > <#me> ex:myFriend whose_emailAddress_is_<mailto:somebody@example.com> Not quite, but you *could* do the following (though it's pretty strange IMO) <#me> ex:someFriendsEmail <mailto:somebody@example.com> . Of course, if all you care about is notational compactness, N3 would allow you to say the first example above as: <#me> ex:myFriend [ ex:emailAddress <mailto:somebody@example.com> ] . Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:55:59 UTC