- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:46:40 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > > At 12:49 28/09/03 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote: > >> Any interpretation of a Literal is (must be) determined by the >> property it hangs off. Literals do not have a denotation (that's why >> they're literal) - although typed literals confuse the matter slightly. > > > This is not true in the current semantics. > > Almost the reverse: literals are the only form of graph nodes that have > a specified denotation independent of the interpretation (model > theoretic sense) that is used. Which is why I say they have no denotation :) Bill de hÓra
Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 10:46:49 UTC