Re: Is rdfs:Resource always implied?

On Friday, 30 May 2003 at 01:26, Jimmy Cerra wrote:

> Since the spec says that everything in RDF is a resource, would the
> above graph also imply the statement (which is the same one as before):

> #foo <rdf:type> <rdfs:Resource>
Yes. This is described at the end of the new RDF Model Theory draft
(http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfs_entail). Entailment rdfs4a says
that if you have a triple of the form xxx aaa yyy . then you add
another triple: xxx rdf:type rdfs:Resource .




- Ian <iand@internetalchemy.org>
"Minds are like books - they work best when open"

Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 04:44:23 UTC